As the
November elections draw closer, there's been a disturbing trend that
has been on the rise now more than previous elections, and the trend
may be coming at a time where it could naturally be extending further
past electoral politics. We've seen it gaining momentum for years,
but November may just be the spark to really ignite the building
cannon fodder. This trend I'm referring to is the obvious idea of “Us
VS Them”, and for those who don't pay much mind to the world around
them let me start by saying that this is a very dangerous ideology to
be had.
I hadn't even thought about writing a
posting about this until earlier today, when the topic of religion
came up between myself and some of my fellow peers. The how and why
of the origins of the conversation don't matter, but the one thing
that left me rather perplexed was a remark that was made. To
paraphrase, as my memory isn't the best and I don't want anyone to
come back saying that this wasn't their exact words, “There's
people like us and then there are others”. After asking what it was
meant by others, the answer was to the effect of “People who don't
fully believe in God or Jesus”. Once again, not an exact quote, but
paraphrasing.
Now, I don't think that this wording in
and of itself is malicious. In fact, given the known background I
have of the peer I can almost guarantee it was not of malicious
nature. I may not believe in a for sure God and I don't fully buy
into all the stories of Jesus and the bible, but I didn't find it to
be offensive. What I did find to be interesting about it though was
that someone who I see multiple times a week was putting me in a
category of “Other”. Before anyone stops here to comment that I
may be feeling what it's like to be anyone who doesn't have the White
Male Heterosexual CIS Able-Bodied Christian privileged, let me stop
you right there. I know. This isn't my first rodeo on being labeled
as an “Other”. What it is though is an observation of just how
easy people take that view these days, of the Us VS Them mentality.
To be honest though, I can't blame them so much.
Throughout the past fifteen years, a
lot has happened to make such a situation appear natural. At first we
had 9/11. I know there are centuries of other examples to choose from
that could be designated as what started this first, but 9/11 is what
I use as it's easiest for most to understand. To show my age, I was
only eleven when those events took place, and the events that
happened afterwards essentially shaped the world I live in today.
Nine days afterwards we had our President addressing both congress
and the American people, saying that “Either you are with us, or
you are with the terrorists.” Such a simple sentence carries big
meaning though. Granted, it was in the heat of the moment still, yet
when that sentiment carries on, you really start to think about both
sides. For me, it clicked after a while. I obviously don't like what
the terrorists are doing, but why does that mean I have to suddenly
agree with everything my nation is doing? Must I approve of
water-boarding and extreme interrogation techniques in order to show
that I disagree with killing thousands of innocent people in the name
of a religion?
As I grew older, I realized two things
wrong with the mentality that was building. First is that there's
almost never an idea of black or white. There are almost always
various shades of gray in the argument, and sometimes even some red,
green, and blue. The second thing realized is that for those who only
see it in black in white, this new way of thinking can pose issues
both outside and within themselves. It becomes Us VS Them VS Us. To
really detail that idea, let's take a look at the current
presidential elections.
At the moment, we're in the primaries
season and we're still figuring out who's going to be the
representative for the two big parties for the main event in
November. This mean obvious infighting for the parties, but I can't
recall ever having a situation like we have now. Usually there's
major infighting in one party and the other seems to settle out real
quick. In our case though, we're seeing massive rifts in both
parties, both rifts involving outliers in several aspects. I could
easily make a list a few feet long. Possible first woman president, a
democratic socialist who happens to not be of Christian faith but
Jewish, a very conservative and heavily baptist senator, and a brash
yet surprisingly open billionaire. We have from this the ideas of if
you don't vote Clinton you can't really be a feminist, if you really
don't like the establishment you have to vote for Trump or Sanders,
and there's no way a god fearing republican can truly vote for anyone
aside from Cruz. These aren't just assumptions made up, but actual
statements most of us have probably heard in the past few months.
It doesn't just stop there either. We
have technologists fighting with the governments stance over
encryption where the government is seemingly trying to force
companies to do their bidding, as opposed to trying to come to
potential compromises. We have more people feeling like when the
police are involved in things it's the same ideology, when at the
same time many police are not only believing it's them against the
world but they are even being trained to believe that that is the
case. Some people may be in the right to believe this ideology, don't
get me wrong. The world sometimes can be in black and white, and I
wouldn't say that it's never the case. The point is that we need to
accept that it isn't the case every damn time.
I suppose now that I'm coming to a
close you may be asking what my solution is. I've stated the problem,
so where's the solution? If that's what you'd be asking me after
reading all this, I have no answer. I see no way of magically solving
this on the wide scale, or even the medium scale for that matter.
Even for the small scale, I couldn't give an honest answer from
myself as I'd have a hard time explaining it better than Josh Lyman
from The West Wing in the episode of "ISAAC AND ISHMAEL".
If you haven't seen that episode, third season and you don't even
need to really watch any episodes before to catch what's going on as
it's a special episode that doesn't fit into the main story. I
implore you to watch it. For those who don't though, let me leave the
quote here in response to terrorism, as well as a quote from Night
Vale's own Cecil Palmer.
“Learn things. Be good to each other.
Read the newspapers, go the movies, go to a party. Read a book. In
the meantime, remember pluralism. You want to get these people? I
mean, you really want to reach in and kill them where they live? Keep
accepting more than one idea. Makes 'em absolutely crazy.”
-Josh Lyman, The West Wing S03E00
"ISAAC AND ISHMAEL"
“We all have our regionalisms. For
instance, in many parts of the country, there is a sandwich, known as
a sub sandwich, that is in other places known as a hero, a hoagie, a
grinder, a longburger, a prince’s delight, or a bread burrito.
It is in these little details that we see ourselves, that we define how we are not others, and thus how we are ourselves.
When confronted with someone whose “normal” is not our “normal,” we are forced to confront the most frightening prospect of all: that there is no such thing as “normal.” Just the accidental cultural moment we happened to be born into, a cultural happenstance that never existed before, and will never exist again.
Our idea of “normal” is a city
built on sand. For instance, for us, our city is literally built on
sand and this is our “normal.” We resist difference because it
requires we acknowledge that the culture we grew up with as “normal”
is just a momentary accident. It requires we accept that the world we
were born into will never be the same as the world we die in. The
longer we live, the more we become interlopers, even in our home
towns. But, if we’d let it happen, also, the more we will learn. “
-Cecil Palmer, Welcome To Night Vale:
Episode 83 - One Normal Town